Getting students to read what’s assigned

Begin forwarded message:

From: Faculty Focus <no-reply>

Subject: Getting students to read what’s assigned

Date: February 20, 2017 at 9:37:17 AM EST

To: mimber

Reply-To: no-reply

View this email as a web page here.
Faculty Focus
Faculty_Focus_640x80_socialLeader.jpeg
February 20, 2017
An Activity That Promotes Engagement with Required Readings, Even in Large Classes
By Ashley Harvey, PhD, LMFT

On the first day of class, I often say something like this to my students: “Nothing floats my boat more than great discussion. Nothing promotes great discussion like having completed the readings. And nothing promotes completing the readings like having points attached to it.”

Encouraging students to complete the course readings is an age-old problem. When I was a graduate student, Douglas Sprenkle, now a professor emeritus at Purdue University, used a primary and secondary reaction discussion format that inspired thrilling class discussions. Years before discussion boards, Professor Sprenkle divided the class into two groups that alternated between serving as primary and secondary reactors to weekly readings. Primary reactors were the conversation starters, required to e-mail the class a critical reaction to weekly readings (what we liked, did not like, agreed with, and disagreed with) no later than 24 hours prior to class time. Secondary reactors were to read the readings and the primary reactions and then come to class prepared to continue the conversation with statements like these: “In their primary reactions, Beth and Miguel both mentioned X. My thoughts are this ____ but a question I have for the group is ____ .”

I have since used Sprenkle’s primary and secondary reaction format via discussion boards in dozens of small (i.e., with fewer than 20 students) on-campus and online courses—simply adjusting the length and complexity of the readings and the primary reaction (250–400 words) to suit the course level. Sometimes students alternate being primary and secondary reactors for each set of readings; sometimes they are both primary and secondary reactors for the readings—meaning that they must all post online before class, read each other’s postings, and then continue the conversation in class.

However, making this approach work in large classes was much more challenging. How could I use the primary and secondary format in classes of 100 students? With the help of some excellent teaching assistants, I now have a reaction discussion format that I have used in more than 25 large classes. Here’s how I do it:

  1. First, I divide the class into discussion groups of 5–7 members and assign 2–4 relevant readings for each reaction discussion, with 6–8 reaction discussions over the course of the semester.
  2. In their groups, students sign up for two primary and two secondary reactions. If there are eight reaction discussions over the course of the semester, students earn points for four of them and simply participate in the other four. For each reaction, the discussion groups typically have two members who post primary reactions that week and two members who are secondary reactors that colead the small-group discussion. Not all students in the group are motivated by points to do the readings each week, but I find that if more than half complete the reading, this is enough to create a rich, small-group discussion.
  3. Primary reactors are charged with beginning the conversation by posting their critical thinking about the readings no later than 24 hours before class (this is guided by the questions that I post for each reading). Primary reactors are also asked to post questions they would like the secondary reactors to consider bringing to the small-group discussion. Secondary reactors are asked to use their own thinking about the readings, as well as questions and ideas from the primary reactors, to develop a written outline of at least seven key points or questions that they use to lead or co-lead their 15–20 minute small-group discussions. During the in-class discussion time, teaching assistants visit each group to ensure that secondary reactors have written outlines in front of them, which they then turn in at the end of the discussion.
  4. Once the small-group discussion is complete, I ask one secondary reactor from each group (or I randomly pick half of the groups) to share one interesting thing their group discussed. Thus, in a class of 100, I typically have 10–15 speakers sharing questions or thoughts that arose in their small-group discussions. As each secondary reactor stands and shares with the class, I paraphrase what he or she says and tie it into other related comments that I have read in the primary reactions or heard in class discussion groups. I also may extend the comments shared by the secondary reactors with related research. If my previously posted questions for the readings are not fully covered by large-group discussion, I pose them to the class and offer my own thoughts.
  5. Last, we send frequent reminders. Prior to each reaction, a teaching assistant sends out three e-mails. The first goes to the entire class, reminding them of the reaction readings and my questions to consider for each reading. The second is sent to the assigned primary reactors, reminding them to post on the course website no later than 24 hours prior to class. A final e-mail goes to the secondary reactors, reminding them to come to class with an outline and prepared to lead a discussion on the readings.

In addition to promoting critical thinking and motivating students to complete the readings, this approach enables students form deeper connections with the material and one another, despite the large class size. An added bonus for me is that I am more aware of students’ preexisting knowledge and can tailor my lectures as needed.

Ashley Harvey is an associate professor and a senior teaching faculty member in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at Colorado State University.

TopHat
Top Hat’s interactive, cloud-based teaching platform enables professors to engage students inside and outside the classroom with compelling content, tools and activities. Millions of students at 700 leading North American colleges and universities use the Top Hat teaching platform. Visit https://tophat.com/ today!
ff-featured-product.jpg
2017 Teaching Professor Conference

June 2-4 in St. Louis

There’s a reason why faculty return to the Teaching Professor Conference year after year. For learning the newest ideas about pedagogy, hearing the latest research, collaborating with colleagues, and simply recharging your batteries, it’s a uniquely engaging and invigorating experience.

Each year this must-attend conference brings together more than 1,000 faculty members from campuses throughout the United States, Canada, and abroad. The conference features seven preconference workshops, two plenary presentations, more than 75 concurrent sessions, and dozens of poster presentations.

The Teaching Professor Conference is the place to:

  • Explore the newest ideas and research in teaching and learning
  • Uncover ways to refresh, reenergize, and reinvigorate your teaching
  • Discover practical strategies that can be integrated into your courses
  • Discuss the state of today’s changing classroom
  • Network with like-minded educators who care deeply about teaching and learning

This conference does not focus on a specific discipline. Instead it is a gathering of teachers with a passion for teaching and a commitment to finding evidence-based solutions to the challenges that we face in our day-to-day practice. We all know the college classroom is changing in new and exciting ways. But with change comes challenge, and that is why dedicating time to your own professional growth is so important.

At the Teaching Professor Conference, you can expect lively discussion, spirited debate, and a rewarding exchange of ideas throughout all three days. You will leave the conference informed, inspired, and brimming with ideas you can put to work in your classroom right away.

We hope you can join us in St. Louis, June 2-4!

Don’t forget … Faculty Focus Premium members can register for just $549—that’s $100 off the current pricing. Simply log into your account, and follow the top-secret instructions provided under Current Member Discounts. Not yet a member? Sign up today and you, too, can take advantage of our special membership pricing. Offer expires March 1, 2017. Good on new registrations only.

Learn More
Teaching Professor Conference
Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Email
Magnapubs-top-logo-1.gif
Magna Publications

2718 Dryden Drive Madison, WI 53704 United States

You received this email because you are subscribed to Emails from Faculty Focus from Magna Publications.
Update your email preferences to choose the type(s) of email you receive, or to unsubscribe from future emails.

Please do not reply to this email; this address is not monitored. If you have a question or concern, contact our customer service team at support or 608-246-3590.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s