Examining the Helicopter Professor Label

Margaret ImberAssociate Dean of the Faculty
Associate Professor of
Classical & Medieval Studies
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240

“She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless she persisted.”

Begin forwarded message:

From: “Faculty Focus” <no-reply>
Date: September 27, 2017 at 8:57:58 AM EDT
To: mimber
Subject: Examining the Helicopter Professor Label
Reply-To: no-reply

Examining the Helicopter Professor Label Are you hovering too close or from a proper distance?

View this email as a web page here.
Faculty Focus
September 27, 2017
Examining the Helicopter Professor Label
By Maryellen Weimer, PhD

Here’s a comment that’s got me thinking.

Kristie McAllum writes in Communication Education, “We have created a system that simply replaces helicopter parents with helicopter professors. . . . Through our constant availability to clarify criteria, explain instructions, provide micro-level feedback, and offer words of encouragement, we nourish millennials’ craving for continuous external affirmations of success and reduce their resilience in the face of challenges or failure.”

There’s no question that teachers can do too much for students. We can take already dependent learners and make them more so. And there’s also no question that teachers can fail to do enough for students. We can withhold the guidance and support that makes learning experiences positive and constructive. The more interesting question is how we know whether we are doing too much or not enough. It’s a question that applies to individual courses, the programs to which they belong, and within our institutions.

Unfortunately, we can’t be sure about the accuracy of student feedback when they tell us what they need. If they tend to be dependent learners, as many of our students are, they will happily encourage us to make all the decisions about learning, thereby excusing them from making any decisions. And if we aren’t providing enough guidance, they probably won’t divulge that half the time spent working on an assignment was devoted to trying to figure out what we wanted.

Are there other benchmarks we could use to determine if we’re doing too much or too little? Could we look at individual policies and practices? Does extra credit coddle students? What about dropping the lowest score? What if teacher feedback is only provided on the final version of the term paper? Should we call on students who very obviously don’t want to participate? Or, must individual policies and practices be considered in light of course content and who’s enrolled in the course? Do students need more support when the content is especially challenging or requires sophisticated skills they have yet to develop? Does it matter whether the course is one taken by beginning students, majors, students fulfilling a general education requirement, first-generation students, or seniors in a capstone? Are there good reasons to do more for beginning students and less for seniors?

And what about individual differences? Our tendency to broadly categorize students by generation (Generation X, millennials) makes me nervous. This tendency allows for convenient groupings, but it also makes stereotyping an easy next step. Not all students fit in any group and to assume that all millennials act entitled and only want praise can result in approaches to teaching that don’t work for some or even most of the students in any given class.

Student Entitlement: Truth, Fiction, or Some of Both? Join Maryellen Weimer for a frank discussion about student entitlement, where it comes from, and what you can do about it. Learn More

Most of the characteristics attributed to millennial students are not positive, perhaps deservedly, although it’s hard to believe they don’t have at least a couple commendable features. But whatever we believe about them—they need support and praise, or they need rules and accountability—ends up influencing how we approach them, the policies we adopt, and the strategies we use. We need to be clear in our thinking about who belongs in that group and what best serves the learning of those who do and don’t display the group’s typical characteristics.

I don’t think there’s much chance of reaching consensus in a conversation about how closely teachers, programs, and institutions should hover around students. It’s easy to see the error of the extremes, but where’s the middle? We need a place between the two and a balance of both, but where that place is or how that balance is determined—now that’s what we need to be talking about, even if we end up disagreeing.

Currently, being labeled a helicopter parent or professor is not an accolade. But as we consider our relationships with students and their learning needs, we need to remember that hovering is what makes helicopters unique and useful. They just need to do it at a safe distance and that’s the distance we need to discover.

Reference: Kristie McAllum, (2016) Managing imposter syndrome among the “Trophy Kids”: Creating teaching practices that develop independence in millennial students. Communication Education, 65 (3), 363-365.

Student Entitlement: Truth, Fiction, or Some of Both?
Date: Wednesday, October 18
Maryellen Weimer, PhD
$247 (through 10/6/17, $297 thereafter)

Most college instructors could (and do) argue that they’ve noticed a growing number of students who have a sense of academic entitlement.

Let’s face it—you’ve probably run into situations where a student expects a better grade than they deserve or demands unnecessary special accommodations.

So, where does this sense of entitlement come from? And what can you do to show students that an entitled attitude is counterproductive?

Join Maryellen Weimer as she breaks it all down in Student Entitlement: Truth, Fiction, or Some of Both? During the 60-minute program, you’ll learn about the roots of entitlement, as well as strategies for not only decreasing, but also preventing the potency of entitled students.

Upon completion of this seminar, you’ll be able to:

  • Implement teaching methods that will increase students’ personal responsibility
  • Identify ways to decrease inappropriate attitudes and expectations
  • Learn how to address educational consumerism while maintaining your standards
  • Create classrooms that are just and fair spaces for all
  • Structure a classroom environment that will lead to greater student success

Take advantage of the early-bird discount. Enroll by October 18 and pay only $247 (a $50 savings).

faculty focus premium
Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Email
Magna Publications

2718 Dryden Drive Madison, WI 53704 United States

You received this email because you are subscribed to Emails from Faculty Focus from Magna Publications.
Update your email preferences to choose the type(s) of email you receive, or to unsubscribe from future emails.

Please do not reply to this email; this address is not monitored. If you have a question or concern, contact our customer service team at support or 608-246-3590.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s